Sustainable Capitalism - February 15, 2012
(Editor’s note: what follows is the Introduction
to a large position paper. The full
paper can be viewed at the link below. A long list of the experts who contributed
to the development of this paper is included in the appendix.)
______________________________________________________________________
The challenges facing the planet today are
unprecedented and extraordinary; climate change, water scarcity, poverty,
disease, growing inequality of income and wealth, demographic shifts,
trans-border and internal migration, urbanization and a global economy in a
state of constant dramatic volatility and flux, to name but a few. While governments and civil society will
need to be part of the solution to these massive challenges, ultimately it will
be companies and investors that will mobilize the capital needed to overcome them.
To address these sustainability challenges, we
advocate for a paradigm shift to Sustainable
Capitalism; a framework that seeks to maximize long-term economic value
creation by reforming markets to address real needs while considering all costs
and stakeholders. The objective of this paper is twofold. First, we
make the economic case for mainstreaming Sustainable Capitalism by highlighting
the fact that it does not represent a trade-off with profit maximization but
instead actually fosters superior long-term value creation. Second, we
recommend five key actions for immediate adoption that will accelerate the
mainstreaming of Sustainable Capitalism by 2020:
1. Identify and
incorporate risks from stranded assets;
2. Mandate integrated
reporting;
3. End the default practice of issuing quarterly earnings guidance;
4. Align compensation structures with long-term sustainable performance;
and
5. Encourage long-term
investing with loyalty-driven securities.
In addition, we also believe that there are five
broader ideas that merit ongoing support and attention. Specifically, we think
there is a need to:
i. Reinforce
sustainability as a fiduciary issue;
ii. Create advisory
services for sustainable asset management;
iii. Expand the range and
depth of sustainable investment products;
iv. Reconsider the appropriate definition for growth beyond GDP; and
v. Integrate
sustainability into business education at all levels.
Ben Franklin famously said, “You may delay, but time
will not, and lost time is never found again.” We have the opportunity to
rebuild for the long term and an obligation to seize it. Sustainable Capitalism
will create opportunities and rewards but it will also mean challenging the pernicious orthodoxy of
short-termism. Now is the time to accelerate the transition.
We have often said the market is long on short and
short on long. Yet, remarkably, even after enduring the global financial crisis
– caused in significant part by
short-term, unsustainable strategies and actions by both companies and
investors – many of us are still content to embrace short-termism in nearly
all aspects of our lives. From investing, to living beyond our means, to
relying on instant opinion polls and tolerating a political discourse based
upon sound bites, tweets, and 30-second TV commercials, we focus far too
frequently on instant gratification and immediate results. As a result of this
short-term perspective, we are – in economist Herman Daly’s prescient phrase –
driving our economies and our planet into liquidation.
Before the crisis and since, we, and others, have
called for a more long-term and responsible form of capitalism, what we call
Sustainable Capitalism. Sustainable Capitalism seeks to maximize long-term economic
value creation. It explicitly integrates environmental, social, and governance
(ESG) factors into strategy, the measurement of outputs and the assessment of
both risks and opportunities.
Sustainable Capitalism encourages us to generate
financial returns in a long-term and responsible manner, and calls for internalizing
negative externalities through appropriate pricing.
For companies, this means internalizing the business
case for sustainability and adapting business models accordingly, with C-level
and board support. It means talking openly and candidly about the need to build
businesses for the long term and rewarding investors who endorse this approach.
In addition, this more responsible approach can be and should be supported by
the adoption of integrated reporting (defined on p 4).
For asset owners, this means embracing the long term
and sustainability as value-creating tools. In particular, it means recognizing
the risks that stranded assets carry (defined on p 3) and embracing ways to reshape
incentives across the investment value chain. Consultants and advisers will be
critical in facilitating this change and are urged to adopt similar long-term
sustainability-orientated principles.
For asset managers, this means investing for the long
term and adopting incentive structures that reward such behavior. It means
carefully considering the effect of sustainability factors on the valuation of companies
and then changing their mindsets and financial models in response.
For governments, this means understanding that there
are serious and on-going fundamental market failures that threaten not only the
future of our companies and investments, but also the sustainability of our planet.
It means not just focusing on global treaties, government policy and legal
solutions at summits but also understanding and adopting the more immediate
changes that can be made to alter incentives and behaviors, and partnering with
business to find solutions.
For Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), this means
clearly defining their role in the economic system. It means developing a
better understanding of the motivations of companies and investors and
identifying ways to encourage them to change through appropriate methods of
impactful engagement. It means drawing attention to unsustainable practices in
financial markets and lobbying not just on single issues but for structural
changes in the way that the global economy deals with the challenge of
sustainability.
For the media, this means challenging companies – and
commentators – to do more than just talk about sustainability and holding
companies to a high standard when evaluating their actions. It means encouraging
the adoption of integrated reporting and celebrating those companies that prove
the business case for sustainability. It also means providing a forum for
debate in order to win over the mainstream.
1 comment:
A very well-thought out paper. I agree with all of their conclusions but worry about adoption of their proposals. I would have liked them to have included some case studies of successful companies that have implemented their proposals. If leading companies showed success in their sectors it would encourage others to follow. I really like the emphasis on long-term strategies and reporting.
Post a Comment