GREEN MONEY CAN AVERT A
NATIONAL DEBT DEFAULT
As an illustration, let
us consider a hypothetical scenario for bringing green money (paper and
electronic) into the equation in a gradual way.
This risk averse approach is to insure that there are no unintended
effects that cannot be handled by simple adjustments. An example quarterly adjustment plan based on
the proposed Greenback Renewal Act is shown in Table 1. If enacted this year, these quarters could
start this year, or Jan 1 2013 latest.
Table 1.
Ramping up the Green Money Injection
|
QUARTER
|
Daily Green Money Injection
|
Quarterly
Green Money injection
|
|
Q1
|
$1.25
billion per workday
|
$81.25 Billion
|
|
Q2
|
$2.5 billion
|
$162.5 Billion
|
|
Q3
|
$3.75 billion
|
$243.75 Billion
|
|
Q4
|
$5 billion
|
$325 Billion
|
If
you total up the green money injections shown in Table 1, you get $652.50 Billion for the year. That is not enough to cover the whole
projected budget deficit, but it is about half of it. And continuation of the increases in the same
manner for another year will completely wipe out the federal budget deficit and
keep the national debt on a steadily downward trend. It also satisfies the Budget Control Act
requirement for a deficit reduction plan reducing
deficits by at least $2.3 Trillion over the next ten years. In fact it would reduce deficits by the
requisite amount well within three years,
thus averting the horrible sequestration cuts that will otherwise occur.
There
is another way that green money can
be employed to bring down the debt in a more dramatic way. And that is by buying up the Fed’s portfolio of US Bonds with green money. These bonds were purchased with money
created out of nothing by the Fed, a power granted to them by Congress, and
hence the debt owed to the Fed and the
interest due on these bonds is nonsensical.
Congress could have issued the money directly without debt and without
interest. Thomas Edison put it this way:
“But here is the point:
If the Nation can issue a dollar bond it can issue a dollar bill. The element
that makes the bond good makes the bill good also. The difference between the
bond and the bill is that the bond lets the money broker collect twice the
amount of the bond and an additional 20%;
whereas the currency, the honest sort provided by the Constitution, pays nobody
but those who contribute in some useful way.
It is absurd to say our Country can issue bonds and cannot issue
currency. Both are promises to pay, but one fattens the usurer and the other
helps the People. If the currency issued by the People were no good, then the
bonds would be no good, either. It is a terrible situation when the Government,
to insure the National Wealth, must go in debt and submit to ruinous interest
charges at the hands of men who control the fictitious value of gold.” (New York Times, December 6, 1921)
So
by buying bonds held by Federal Reserve Banks back with green money, Congress
is basically “undoing” the error that was committed by letting the Fed create
the money in its stead. It would be
stipulated that the Federal Reserve Bank Credit that was created for each bond
purchase would be extinguished upon buyback by the Treasury Department, being
replaced by the equal dollar amount in green money, so that the amount of
monetary base (M0) would be unaffected by the repurchase of the bonds.
This would amount to a transformation
of M0 from Federal Reserve Credit into US Bank Deposits, which could be split
up into four quarterly $412.5 billion repurchases, to be completed in one
years’ time. Of course, the Federal
Reserve Note currency would be replaced with US Note currency as well, so that at the end of a year’s time, M0 would
consist entirely of government issued money, no part of it being Fed created
money. This $1.65 trillion reduction
in the national debt would constitute about 10% of the total national debt and
would put the US well on the way towards the debt free status. The credit rating of the nation would be
restored, since it would be apparent that the country can make good on ALL of
its debts in due time, once it realizes its power to create money at a responsible
rate and exercises the will to do so. In summary:
Debt Reduction
Plan for a debt-free nation
1. All US Bonds in possession for the Federal Reserve Banks
(approximately $1.6 trillion) shall be replaced with US Money through the
purchase of US Bonds held in the portfolios of the various Federal Reserve
Banks;
2. One fourth of the US
bonds owned by the Fed (approximately $0.4 Billion) shall be replaced with US Money during each quarter of the
first year following passage of this act.
Hence, all US Treasury bonds will be replaced with US Money at
the end of the year following passage of this act, thus reducing the National
Debt by approximately $1.6 trillion in the first year.
3. Federal Reserve Notes shall be retired gradually as US Notes are
issued into circulation in such a way that total currency held by the non-bank
public will grow at a rate appropriate for the needs of commerce. Federal Reserve Notes held by banks as vault
cash will be replaced with US Notes during the first year following passage of
this act.
4. Upon passage of this act,
the Federal Reserve Banks will cease and
desist from further purchases of US Bonds.
Hence after the first year following the commencement of this act is
completed, Federal Reserve Bank share of the national debt shall be, and shall
remain, 0%.
5. Non-Federal Reserve debt and interest on the debt shall be
paid off with existing or new US Money as provided for in the annual budget.
6. Loan repayments from foreign entities to the Federal Reserve, including those reported
in Table 8 on page 131 of GAO-11-696 and those based on subsequent loans to
foreign entities, being outside the purview of the mandates for the Federal
Reserve System, including both principal and interest, shall be transferred to the US Treasury account on a daily basis as
received from the foreign debtors. The Federal Reserve shall cease and desist from
future loans to foreign entities, except as approved by Congress.
1 comment:
For the person who posted this question. What would be the incentive for all the current US debt holders to hold the new greenbacks, since they are just paper, paying no interest?
I believe the person who posted this question, has Dollars (the currency) mixed up with Bonds (which is a promise to pay back the principle and pays annual interest on the bonds). The Federal Reserve Notes in your wallet, and the electronic equivalent in your checking account, are issued by the Federal Reserve Banks, a private banking cartel. It is a cartel, since the Fed has a monopoly on issuing the currency. No State, County or City government is allowed to issue its own currency. Only the Federal Government can do that. With the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, the Congress gave away the issuing of the currency to a private banking cartel called the Federal Reserve. It is no more Federal than Federal Express. It is an independent agency who's Capital Stock is owned by the Commercial Banks. It is not a part of the US Government. Of course the Constitution in Article 1 Section 8 says: Congress has the right to coin Money and regulate the Value thereof. In 1776, the word coin meant to issue or create or make. Coin is a verb. So the Government can also print paper money which it did during the Revolutionary War called Continentals and during the Civil War called Green Backs.
The Government now issues Bonds that pay interest. They could continue to do that in the future with any form of momentary reform. Nothing would stop the Government from continuing to sell interest bearing bonds. They would just stop selling the bonds to the Federal Reserve for the issuing of the currency. They would sell them on the Open Market and anyone could buy them. Individuals, Banks, Pension Funds, Governments, etc.
With the US Treasury issuing the currency called Treasury Notes, the Fed would be by-passed. The Fed would no longer be issuing Federal Reserve Notes. US Treasury Notes would be exchanged for all outstanding Federal Reserve Notes on a $1 for $1 dollar basis. So no one would lose their money.
Tom Dietrich
Post a Comment